Keyword summary
61%1 analyzed article/video1,165 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us-Israel Defense Cooperation results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 438 hits. Analysis detected 2,006 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,495 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 58% (22,215 of 52,165 keywords). This Us-Israel Defense Cooperation is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Us-Israel Defense Cooperation
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
58%Us-Israel Defense Cooperation (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,495
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510057.4% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.5%12.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.1%Straw Man: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos