Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These US House Democrats results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 580 hits. Analysis detected 3,598 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,157 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 34,582 keywords). This US House Democrats is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
US House Democrats
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%US House Democrats (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,157
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.0%15.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 12.3%12.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 26.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos