Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Us Customs And Border Patrol results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 922 hits. Analysis detected 5,485 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,144 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Us Customs And Border Patrol is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Us Customs And Border Patrol
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,144
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 29.3%29.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 29.0%29.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 18.0%18.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 16.5%16.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 29.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 29.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos