Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Us Border results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 330 hits. Analysis detected 4,293 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,545 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Us Border is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Us Border
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Us Border (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,545
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 20.8%20.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 16.4%16.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 14.4%14.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 20.8%20.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 21.4%21.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 12.0%12.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.7%15.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 11.9%11.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.4%11.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 21.4%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 20.8%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 20.8%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos