Keyword summary
55% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,507 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Uruguay results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Recency Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 1,168 hits . Analysis detected 4,690 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,272 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (20,704 of 37,536 keywords). This Uruguay is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group. Uruguay
Keyword details
Total words: 6,272
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.8% percentile 2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.6% 18.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Horn Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst