Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,344 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urbi Et Orbi results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 52% saturation with 2,087 hits . Analysis detected 10,432 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,014 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.4% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,830 of 37,536 keywords). This Urbi Et Orbi is worse (more manipulative) than 95.10% of the peer group. Urbi Et Orbi
Keyword details
Total words: 4,014
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.1% percentile 10.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 52.0% 52.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 43.6% 43.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 38.9% 38.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 16.5% 16.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 52.0%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 43.6%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 38.9%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 3.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 6.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst