Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,180 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Upstate New York results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Halo Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 626 hits. Analysis detected 4,226 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (21,018 of 37,536 keywords). This Upstate New York is better (less manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
Upstate New York
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
44%Upstate New York (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,720
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

44% percentile
025507510044.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 13.3%13.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 10.0%10.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos