Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 780 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University Of Toronto results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 584 hits . Analysis detected 5,870 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,900 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (27,506 of 37,536 keywords). This University Of Toronto is better (less manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group. University Of Toronto
Keyword details
Total words: 7,900
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.7% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst