Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These University Of Minnesota results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 299 hits. Analysis detected 2,596 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,733 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This University Of Minnesota is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
University Of Minnesota
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,733
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos