Keyword summary
⁠8%1 analyzed article/video2,431 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University Of Computer Sciences results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 449 hits. Analysis detected 3,610 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,724 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (42,950 of 43,695 keywords). This University Of Computer Sciences is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group.
University Of Computer Sciences
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Wyomings Big Show1%
⁠0%Wyoming's Big Show1%
⁠0%Sweetwater Events Complex1%
⁠0%Ffa1%
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠2%University Of Computer Sciences (selected)1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,724
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

2% percentile
02550751001.7% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos