Keyword summary
26% 1 analyzed article/video 762 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University Of Alabama At Birmingham results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 166 hits . Analysis detected 1,389 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,048 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 25% (40,938 of 54,562 keywords). This University Of Alabama At Birmingham is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group. University Of Alabama At Birmingham
Keyword details
Total words: 3,048
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Red Herring: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst