Keyword summary
53% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,759 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University Health results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 793 hits . Analysis detected 6,751 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,039 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (25,263 of 34,557 keywords). This University Health is better (less manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group. University Health
Keyword details
Total words: 9,039
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst