Keyword summary
68% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,804 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Universal School Meals results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 1,098 hits . Analysis detected 6,395 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,146 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (24,771 of 36,715 keywords). This Universal School Meals is better (less manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group. Universal School Meals
Keyword details
Total words: 7,146
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.4% 15.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst