Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video568 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ultra Filtered Milk results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 24.1% saturation with 548 hits. Analysis detected 3,315 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,272 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of 87% (5,025 of 37,536 keywords). This Ultra Filtered Milk is worse (more manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group.
Ultra Filtered Milk
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
87%Ultra Filtered Milk (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,272
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

87% percentile
025507510086.6% percentile
6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 24.1%24.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.8%17.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 7.2%7.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 13.1%13.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 24.1%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos