Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video905 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ulises Lara results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 436 hits. Analysis detected 3,791 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,620 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (16,112 of 37,536 keywords). This Ulises Lara is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Ulises Lara
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠58%Ulises Lara (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,620
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510057.1% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.0%12.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos