Keyword summary
15%1 analyzed article/video3,715 analyzed words
BS Summary: These UK Embassy results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Recency Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 558 hits. Analysis detected 3,552 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,145 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 2% (35,220 of 35,665 keywords). This UK Embassy is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group.
UK Embassy
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
2%UK Embassy (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,145
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

1% percentile
02550751001.2% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos