Keyword summary
75% 1 analyzed article/video 1,165 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ufw Foundation results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 577 hits . Analysis detected 3,764 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 67% (19,030 of 56,808 keywords). This Ufw Foundation is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group. Ufw Foundation
Keyword details
Total words: 4,660
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.5% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Straw Man: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst