Keyword summary
⁠34%2 analyzed articles/videos2,457 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ucsf results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 601 hits. Analysis detected 5,626 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,275 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (32,713 of 35,047 keywords). This Ucsf is better (less manipulative) than 93.30% of the peer group.
Ucsf
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠7%Ucsf (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,275
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

7% percentile
02550751006.7% percentile
1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos