Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,537 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Uconn Huskies results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 1,794 hits . Analysis detected 11,759 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,148 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (21,099 of 35,668 keywords). This Uconn Huskies is better (less manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group. Uconn Huskies
Keyword details
Total words: 10,148
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.8% percentile 2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.7% 17.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst