Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,352 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ubs Group results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 633 hits. Analysis detected 5,443 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (14,046 of 37,536 keywords). This Ubs Group is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group.
Ubs Group
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠63%Ubs Group (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,408
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

63% percentile
025507510062.6% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos