Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,429 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ubs Global Real Estate Bubble Index results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Anecdotal , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 1,638 hits . Analysis detected 11,587 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,339 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 83% (6,376 of 37,536 keywords). This Ubs Global Real Estate Bubble Index is worse (more manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group. Ubs Global Real Estate Bubble Index
Keyword details
Total words: 5,339
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.0% percentile 5.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 23.3% 23.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 16.4% 16.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 30.7% 30.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 30.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst