Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 450 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S UK Relations results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 372 hits . Analysis detected 2,455 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,800 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 85% (5,744 of 37,536 keywords). This U S UK Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group. U S UK Relations
Keyword details
Total words: 1,800
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.7% percentile 5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 19.1% 19.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 20.7% 20.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.7%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 19.1%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst