Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video5,197 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Israel War On Iran results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 2,765 hits. Analysis detected 16,966 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (29,785 of 37,536 keywords). This U S Israel War On Iran is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
U S Israel War On Iran
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠21%U S Israel War On Iran (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 20,788
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

21% percentile
025507510020.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles20.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 13.3%13.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos