Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video386 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Israel Relationship results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 352 hits. Analysis detected 1,982 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,544 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of 87% (4,989 of 37,536 keywords). This U S Israel Relationship is worse (more manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group.
U S Israel Relationship
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
87%U S Israel Relationship (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,544
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

87% percentile
025507510086.7% percentile
6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 18.9%18.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.7%13.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 22.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos