Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Iran Ceasefire results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 1,063 hits . Analysis detected 6,147 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,672 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 30% (25,130 of 35,654 keywords). This U S Iran Ceasefire is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group. U S Iran Ceasefire
Keyword details
Total words: 8,672
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst