Keyword summary
75%1 analyzed article/video1,425 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U N Peacekeeping results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 440 hits. Analysis detected 3,502 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,275 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (20,007 of 37,536 keywords). This U N Peacekeeping is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
U N Peacekeeping
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
47%U N Peacekeeping (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,275
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

47% percentile
025507510046.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.4%9.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos