Keyword summary
41%2 analyzed articles/videos1,309 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tyrannosaurus Rex results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 475 hits. Analysis detected 3,763 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,584 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (22,494 of 37,536 keywords). This Tyrannosaurus Rex is better (less manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group.
Tyrannosaurus Rex
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
41%Tyrannosaurus Rex (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,584
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

40% percentile
025507510040.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos