Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video748 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tyler Clancy results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 311 hits. Analysis detected 2,397 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (21,369 of 37,199 keywords). This Tyler Clancy is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Tyler Clancy
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
43%Tyler Clancy (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,992
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

43% percentile
025507510042.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos