Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 748 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tyler Clancy results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 311 hits . Analysis detected 2,397 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (21,369 of 37,199 keywords). This Tyler Clancy is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group. Tyler Clancy
Keyword details
Total words: 2,992
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.6% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst