Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,158 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Twitter Files results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 60.1% saturation with 2,783 hits . Analysis detected 13,920 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,632 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,339 of 35,690 keywords). This Twitter Files is worse (more manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group. Twitter Files
Keyword details
Total words: 4,632
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.6% percentile 7.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 60.1% 60.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 35.7% 35.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 25.6% 25.6% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 18.8% 18.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 20.4% 20.4% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 60.1%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 35.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 25.6%, sitewide 2.0% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 18.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 15.9% Horn Effect: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 1.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Straw Man: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst