Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Twitter Dms results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 37.5% saturation with 822 hits. Analysis detected 4,736 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 36,748 keywords). This Twitter Dms is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Twitter Dms
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Twitter Dms (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,192
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 24.9%24.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 37.5%37.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 22.6%22.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 18.8%18.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 16.1%16.1%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 12.6%12.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 37.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 18.8%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 24.9%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 0.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos