Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video879 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trump Threats results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 305 hits. Analysis detected 3,573 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,516 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,627 of 37,536 keywords). This Trump Threats is worse (more manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group.
Trump Threats
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
61%Trump Threats (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,516
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

61% percentile
025507510061.0% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.3%6.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos