Keyword summary
98% 1 analyzed article/video 156 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trump Slush Fund results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 55.6% saturation with 347 hits . Analysis detected 1,952 faulty-reasoning hits from 624 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.6% and a BS Rank of 98% (1,000 of 37,536 keywords). This Trump Slush Fund is worse (more manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group. Trump Slush Fund
Keyword details
Total words: 624
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
97% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 97.3% percentile 13.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles624 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 55.6% 55.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 49.8% 49.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 51.9% 51.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 20.2% 20.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 55.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 51.9%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 49.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect: Keyword 31.7%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 20.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 0.5% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 7.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst