Keyword summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video587 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trump Pennsylvania Defense Summit Mccormick Iran results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 197 hits. Analysis detected 1,336 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (19,036 of 37,536 keywords). This Trump Pennsylvania Defense Summit Mccormick Iran is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Trump Pennsylvania Defense Summit Mccormick Iran
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,348
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

49% percentile
025507510049.3% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.1%6.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos