Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Trump Impeachment Inquiry results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 458 hits. Analysis detected 2,883 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Trump Impeachment Inquiry is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Trump Impeachment Inquiry
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,460
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 13.1%13.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.1%16.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos