Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos316 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trump House results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 242 hits. Analysis detected 1,658 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,920 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (23,042 of 34,644 keywords). This Trump House is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
Trump House
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
34%Trump House (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,920
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

34% percentile
025507510033.5% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.8%3.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate