Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,775 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trump Delegation results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 423 hits. Analysis detected 3,442 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (33,723 of 37,536 keywords). This Trump Delegation is better (less manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
Trump Delegation
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
11%Trump Delegation (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,100
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

10% percentile
025507510010.2% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos