Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video482 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Triathlons results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 400 hits. Analysis detected 1,975 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,446 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (5,727 of 37,536 keywords). This Triathlons is worse (more manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group.
Triathlons
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠85%Triathlons (selected)6%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,446
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

85% percentile
025507510084.7% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 21.4%21.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 27.7%27.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 17.3%17.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 27.7%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos