Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 817 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trent Williams results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 1,040 hits . Analysis detected 4,412 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,268 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 74% (10,097 of 37,536 keywords). This Trent Williams is worse (more manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group. Trent Williams
Keyword details
Total words: 3,268
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.1% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 31.8% 31.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 25.7% 25.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 31.8%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 25.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Horn Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst