Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video640 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tree Pollen results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Indoctrination, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 383 hits. Analysis detected 1,945 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (20,213 of 37,536 keywords). This Tree Pollen is better (less manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group.
Tree Pollen
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠47%Tree Pollen (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,560
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

46% percentile
025507510046.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 15.0%15.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos