Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Treasury Secretary results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Tu Quoque , Framing Effect , and Burden of Proof , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 226 hits . Analysis detected 1,239 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,647 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (13,283 of 37,536 keywords). This Treasury Secretary is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group. Treasury Secretary
Keyword details
Total words: 1,647
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.6% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 15.9% Tu Quoque: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 0.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Burden of Proof: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.4% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst