Keyword summary
26%1 analyzed article/video726 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Travis Etienne results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 203 hits. Analysis detected 1,308 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,904 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (32,601 of 37,536 keywords). This Travis Etienne is better (less manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group.
Travis Etienne
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
14%Travis Etienne (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,904
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

13% percentile
025507510013.1% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos