Keyword summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video819 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Training Standards results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 229 hits. Analysis detected 1,530 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,457 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (20,354 of 37,536 keywords). This Training Standards is better (less manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group.
Training Standards
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠46%Training Standards (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,457
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

46% percentile
025507510045.8% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Tu Quoque: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos