Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,275 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trailnet results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 295 hits. Analysis detected 3,342 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,100 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 27% (27,710 of 37,533 keywords). This Trailnet is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Trailnet
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
27%Trailnet (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,100
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510026.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate