Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos830 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trademark Infringement results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 225 hits. Analysis detected 1,112 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,837 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (31,239 of 37,536 keywords). This Trademark Infringement is better (less manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group.
Trademark Infringement
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠17%Trademark Infringement (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,837
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

17% percentile
025507510016.8% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.3%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos