Keyword summary
31% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,781 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trade Policy & Agreements results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 1,944 hits . Analysis detected 11,222 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,557 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (32,756 of 37,536 keywords). This Trade Policy & Agreements is better (less manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group. Trade Policy & Agreements
Keyword details
Total words: 13,557
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst