Keyword summary
100%1 analyzed article/video554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Toxic Substances Control Act results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 396 hits. Analysis detected 3,320 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,662 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of 90% (4,007 of 37,536 keywords). This Toxic Substances Control Act is worse (more manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group.
Toxic Substances Control Act
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,662
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

89% percentile
025507510089.3% percentile
6.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 15.8%15.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 13.6%13.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 16.6%16.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 18.8%18.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.3%11.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 19.9%19.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 23.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 18.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos