Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Tortoises results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 352 hits . Analysis detected 2,773 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,160 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Tortoises is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Tortoises
Keyword details
Total words: 3,160
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst