Keyword summary
15% 1 analyzed article/video 1,114 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Morello results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Anecdotal , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 675 hits . Analysis detected 2,031 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (32,771 of 36,519 keywords). This Tom Morello is better (less manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group. Tom Morello
Keyword details
Total words: 4,456
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst