Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,971 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Gurski results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 579 hits. Analysis detected 3,799 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,884 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (33,525 of 36,644 keywords). This Tom Gurski is better (less manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group.
Tom Gurski
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠9%Tom Gurski (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,884
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

9% percentile
02550751008.5% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos