Keyword summary
23%3 analyzed articles/videos243 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Cruise results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 1,154 hits. Analysis detected 6,580 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,586 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (29,336 of 36,715 keywords). This Tom Cruise is better (less manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group.
Tom Cruise
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
21%Tom Cruise (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,586
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

20% percentile
025507510020.1% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate