Keyword summary
23% 3 analyzed articles/videos 243 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Cruise results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 1,154 hits . Analysis detected 6,580 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,586 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (29,336 of 36,715 keywords). This Tom Cruise is better (less manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group. Tom Cruise
Keyword details
Total words: 10,586
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst